I love these discussions. Readers may have noticed that the nature of the gods in Glorantha is one of my major triggers on the Digest... Not that any discussion actually resolves to anything, of course... I still like the discussion.
> In the second place, the fact that we have not developed such a proof
> hardly means that we can't. It just means we haven't. (Side note: I
> do NOT think such a logical proof is possible. It's part of my
> theology.)
Step 1: Agree on a definition of "Supreme Being" and its nature. Step 2: Discuss the possible existance of above.
Most discussions I've seen on the subject jump in at step 2. IMO, no one can actually complete step 1, as the divine transcends definition... As soon as you've cornered it, it isn't divine anymore... For me this applies to Glorantha and TRW.
Henk Langeveld
Powered by hypermail