Funny, I see superheroes as pathetic creatures. They're like phosphor
flares. They burn VERY brightly, but when they've burnt out, they're gone,
nothing left. Heroes, on the other hand, don't greedily hold onto all
their gifts but share them with their people. Thus, they get to be
worshipped and their existence preserved afterwards. Harrek and
Jar-Eel may be really kewl badasses, but they're spiritual dead-ends.
They've just poured power in and in, but they'll go nowhere. From an
evolutionary standpoint, it could be like a species that keeps evolving
towards incredible combat ability, but at the ultimate expense of
reproductive viability.
Argrath and Monrogh, on the other hand, are heroes, not superheroes. They
share their gifts with their people and have the continued existence
guaranteed. Remember, no superheroes are worshipped after their death,
only heroes. A Hero is an evolutionarily optimized fit, wherein the
creature has become quite deadly, but not at the cost of reproduction.
(Of course, this is a spiritual ANALOG to evolution, so don't get all literal on me.)
Powered by hypermail