RE: David Dunham on ducks

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

From: Sérgio Mascarenhas <sermasalmeida_at_mail.telepac.pt>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 15:48:25 +0100

David Dunham:
> The EWF was known to be making beast men.
Delecti was from the EWF. The ducks are usually classified as beast men. The ducks are moderately friendly with Delecti. All this makes sense if Delecti made them. Not my theory (I think it's Sandy Petersen's), but it makes a lot of sense to me.

Well, as I said in my most recent replly to comments on my work on ducks, I try to incorporate what is posted in GD on this small issue.

My proposition on the comment by David is the next: and if it was all the other way around? Ducks are not a creation of Delecti BUT creatures like ducks and baboons inspired Delecti to create beast men. Since there is no +official; version of ducks, I'll stick to this idea.

>> is Delecti actually Chaotic as I've always assumed?
>I've never assumed so. He makes zombies, sure, but one can be an evil
> scientist without being chaotic.

Great! Its perfectly consistent with what I posted about ducks, Humakt and undead.

Sergio Mascarenhas