Hmm, I would appreciate someone emailing me (i.e. not on-list) what, then, WOULD be the definition of "posting without RQ references" - I mean, here we have it in writing from TAHGC. The possiblity of coming up with legal conformance to this seems less remote to me than it apparently does to Nick.
My whole point? I'd like to get whatever interesting material there was planned for this OUT of the TAHGC dustbins and available. That's all. The TAHGC email seems to indicate that they wouldn't have a problem with this in certain contexts. Could someone (preferably with legal knowledge) please clarify this for me?
Thanks!
- -Steve (styopa_at_iname.com)
or at work (Steve_Lieb_at_lepmsp.com)
http://surf.to/styopa
Powered by hypermail