"Simon Phipp" <simon.phipp_at_walshwestern.com>
> > Nick Brooke Re: Ian's Deezola
>
> This is why I would never post a cult write-up to the Digest.
Of course you could always post cult writeups to the digest, with the
understanding that flaws and possible improvements will be pointed out.
Flaws would include:
- deviation from published materials
- switching between objective (godlearner) and subjective (cultist) POV
- inclusion of irrelevant material, or material suited to another cult
- overly broad cult functionality
- overly powerful magic
- invading other deity's myths
- both rune lords and rune priests in the same cult
So... if you want to improve your cult writeups then post away and be
ready to face a jury of your peers. If you just want to plop them steaming
onto the digest with an unsupported claim that they're the best thing
since pickled walktapus then be prepared for a little flak.
- --
+++++++++++++++++++++++23
Loren Miller <loren_at_wharton.upenn.edu>
Applying computer technology is as easy as finding the right
wrench to hammer in the right screw.