paradoxes etc

From: David Cake <dave_at_starfish.net.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:13:40 +0800

Smon Hibbs

>I believe such paradoxes can be

>> found in each of the major philosophies. These paradoxes
>> do not disprove the philosphies that give rise to them,
>> but are evidence that they are not complete.

        I mention only for interests sake that according to a very loose interpretation of Godels theorem (cf Godel Escher Bach, etc), completeness and containing paradoxes actually go together. Containing no paradoxes is a proof of incompleteness.

	Regards
		David

------------------------------