One could say also that they weren't even "manifest mystics", in any conventional sense, since a relationship with a High God seems to me to be different from any relationship with any mystical Ultimate, whether than be an "orthodox" one or "manifest" one.
I do think that one could use mystical practices to achieve communion with a High God, however, so this is really something of a semantic quibble. If you're "only" seeking that, can you still be a "true" mystic?
> According to Vithelan theology, the High God Oorduren _is_
> liberation. I can't see how that can not be part of the
> mystical Absolute.
He's a part of it, and the route to it. But I don't think he _is_ it. (Or only one defined mighty funny.) For the other High Gods, this would be a even more problematic equation.
Powered by hypermail