Angels angels angels

From: Mike Dawson <mdawson_at_mac.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:05:39 -0500

On Dec 12, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Andrew Solovay wrote:

>
>> Well, I define
>> "angels" as "beings that can talk and have feathers", which is at
>> least
>> as well-established a definition as yours.

So then, both ducks and wind children are angels?

Mike Dawson

--__--__--

End of Glorantha Digest

Powered by hypermail