> I know this would be a MAJOR rules change, but is it that
inconceivable
> that we cap people at their starting AP as the MOST they can have at
> the end of a contest? So effectively winning AP from the other guy
> doesn't really "help" you (for the NEXT contest)? You could possibly
> allow them to range freely up the AP scale WITHIN that single contest,
> but when they restart, it resets to the cap.
Transfers don't happen all that often with the latest rules I've played with (they were a problem with earlier drafts). It's possible to end up with more than you started with, but not that likely.
Keep in mind that new contests *always* start with your starting APs. You're probably talking about a long extended contest?
> I'm still having trouble getting my brain around why a guy who's just
> fought his way through a band of carls should be multiple TIMES more
> effective afterward than before?
Against all your carls he certainly would be!
Powered by hypermail