Re: Greg on Mystics and 2nd Edition

From: Nick Eden <nick_at_...>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 09:29:16 +0100


On Wed, 03 Oct 2001 18:01:35 -0400, Jeff wrote, quoting Greg:

>If there isn't going to be a
>Mystic chapter, how will you describe the Theist cult secrets that for
>now are defined as "works like mystic strike(s)"? Without a Mystic
>chapter, they'd have to be called something else.
>
><<<<<<<<
>
>Of course. This definition has stuck in my craw like a bone ever since
>it
>was published. A good set of rules should not use one system to describe
>another, and of course the proper definition will replace this even if
>mystics did appear.
>
>Many such clarifications are in this edition.

Pleased to hear it. Trust that the phrase "Acts like an integrated Passion Spirit..." is also consigned to the dustbin of history.



York BSAC Web Page:
http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac

Powered by hypermail