>Well, I was told that a cow had changed to 20, but I admit I can't
>find WHERE that was said
What Thunder Rebels says (p43) is that:
1 milk cow = 20 bushels of barley = 5 hogs = 7 ewes = 20 Lunars.
--Peter Metcalfe
>- if Andrew Graham is reading this, I
>believe you told me, can you point it out? If it IS still 15,
>everything gets shifted up one row (except the sample items), and
>stuff above (less valuable than) a single cow can be recosted to
>neater figures. This would put horses back to 5W too, as we know a
>horse = 4 cows (and an ox = 1.5 cows, accounting for the nasty
>numbers in that column).
>
> > Anyway,here is my first example:if a costrating of one pig is
>5,which
> > also equals 3 lunars,then 10 pigs are supposed to be
> > 30 L,your result is 40L....640 pigs are supposed to be
>2560L,instead
> > of 1920(640x3L).
>
><etc.>
>
>Getting a bit obsessed by minutiae, I think, these are meant to be
>guideline brackets, not exact figures! Anyway, you're right, the
>values under 1 cow are rounded a bit funny, as I had to stretch
>things to get a pig to equal 5. If cows are still 15, that'll be easy
>to solve.
>
> > Last one:cottar wereguild is 10cows,thus 20Lx10=200L.The result of
> > your table says 320L.
>
>The wereguilds are NOT exact, the exact figure is given in cows. The
>wereguild is WITHIN the listed bracket, to the nearest 5 points. That
>320 lunars is for 16 cows, not 10.
>
> > What you want is,that the wealthrating is linear.But three minimal
> > wealthy persons (3x5) are not average wealthy,if they join
> > forces.Instead you might say,that their combined wealth is 6.
>
>No, and I agree it's a bit dodgy below 1 cow. Again, that'll be
>better if I'm wrong and 1 cow = 15.
>
>Wulf
>
>
>
>To Post a message, send it to: hw-rules_at_...
>To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: hw-rules-unsubscribe_at_...
>To Complain constructively please email me at steve_at_....
>
Powered by hypermail