> > I fail to see the difference. The topic is a Humakti who
> > uses all these feats as augment. The augments from certain
> > feats such as truesword stroke would seem to me to be lost
> > with the sword.
>The difference is in the use/purpose of the magic.
I'm sorry but I still don't see any necessary difference between augmentations and feats-as-augmentations. In any case, it simply looks like a clash of personal interpretations hence I don't see the point of arguing about it.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail