>No - there is no such magic as "Illusion". In Glorantha, Illusion is
>a meta-magic that allows the user to make other types of magic
>(within the limits of their experience and knowledge).
Try "making temporarily real objects". That's been the basis of illusion in RQ and I haven't seen anything wrong with this definition in the current debate.
>Changing history after the fact to accomodate what we know now, it
>would actually be more likely that the assasin had deception/disguise
>magic rather than illusion.
Given that one could create an illusion of an old man over your face, I don't see the distinction.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail