> > I agree(ish). If the feat is an obvious interpretation of the
> > affinity then either subcult can improvise/use it.
>
> ...
>
> Absolutely not! The affinity names, and thus 'obvious
interpretations'
> are very general. But looking at the provided feats for a sub cult
(or
> even, aspect) shows that the affinities are meant to be interpreted
much
> more narrowly. Allowing all 'obvious interpretations' of a 'combat'
> affinity, for example, would allow gross abuse.
That's an interesting interpretation. It does allow some ammunition to a GM wanting to limit the player's use of potentialy abusive or tenuously related feats. However I can't see this argument going down verry well with the players if it isn't explicitly stated in the rules.
Simon Hibbs
Powered by hypermail