RE: Searching a room : extended contest

From: Dave Bailey <dave.bailey_at_...>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:28:05 +0100

Feels to me like you're reducing the chances of loosing the contest, if the player has more skill then can drag it out to gain a result, if you're doing it this way why not just have a simple test as you would in any other game?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Rafaelsen [SMTP:rafael_at_...]
> Sent: 23 May 2000 10:14
> To: hw-rules_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: Searching a room : extended contest
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2000, Alain Rameau wrote:
>
> > I still have some problems to evaluate AP bidding for
> > passive "oponents".
>
> Do they have to bid? Since you can lose AP when bidding, I see no reason
> for passiv opponents to bid. I would play them with only a resistance
> and an AP pool.
>
>
> Ha en god dag!
> Frank Rafaelsen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
> Remember the good 'ol days
> http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/9/_/385715/_/959073236/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To Post a message, send it to: hw-rules_at_...
>
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: hw-rules-unsubscribe_at_...
>
>

---

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.

---