> This is why I said that HQ2 was
> remarkably "honest" as to what it is.
HQ2 is indeed, entirely honest. No complaints from me on that front!
> That being said, Ash describes exactly how I ended up setting
> resistence levels in HQ1 - I would wait until my players finished
> figuring their fifteen minutes of augment calculations and state their
> total augmented ability. Then I would figure out the resistance based
> on what I would think met the needs of the game dynamic, or in short,
> the pass/fail cycle.
Blimey, no, I can't confidently say that I never once did that. Nor did the only GM I've played with outside a con. (It's more difficult to judge at cons, because of the one-off nature of things, so I can't say one or t'other there).
-- Trotsky Gamer and Skeptic ------------------------------------------------------ Trotsky's RPG website: http://www.ttrotsky.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ Not a Dead Communist: http://jrevell.blogspot.com/
Powered by hypermail