Re: Same-name affinities

From: KYER, JEFFREY <jeff.kyer_at_...>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 16:46:26 -0400

Jonas Schi�tt wrote:
>
> KYER, JEFFREY 00-06-06 18.53
>
> >> > Nice list. Shame about 'Combat' (or rather "the 'Combat's"), though
> >>
> >> I think we've gone over this before, but I don't see anything wrong
> >> with a Combat affinity. It's magic that lets you fold, spindle, or
> >> mutilate people. Why not give all such magic the same name?
>
> >
> >One bennie for having a similar name is that if you have a lot of
> >sub-cults or related deities, one can get a bonus by having affinties
> >that map over.
> >
> >Vinga (Combat, Movement, Protection) and Orlanth A (Air, Combat,
> >Movement) are good examples of such synergy. Yeah, I'm letting our
> >Vingan devotee be an Orlanth A initiate. =P
>
> Hmm, maybe the Vingan could buy feats from Orlanth's (or one of the
> Thunder Brothers') Combat affinities and add it to her own? That would be
> a good benefit of having 'associated cults'...
>
> _____________
> Jonas Schi�tt
> G�teborg

That's how we've been doing it. I think I'd mentioned that earlier (but it was a while ago). If nothing else, it DOES reduce the level of associated cults. I charge her the 'used in adventure' cost.

It seems to work out, which is pretty much the way I like it. As long as everyone's happy... =)

Jeff

Powered by hypermail