Re: Re: stretches and credibility checks - anyone else having difficulty?

From: Todd Gardiner <todd.gardiner_at_...>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:29:17 -0800


I believe that Trotsky missed the innuendo.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Trotsky <TTrotsky_at_...> wrote:

>
>
> Matthew Cole wrote:
> >
> > Trotsky said:
> >
> > I'm willing to try a lot of things in a one-off at a convention >snip<
> >
> > - I've heard about people who "are willing" to "try a lot of things" at
> > "conventions". They always *say* "it's a one-off" but are we really to
> > believe that? :P
> >
> I'm not sure what point you're making here, but I'd say that it's always
> possible you'll like it more than you thought you would, and have
> discovered something new you want to try again. At other times, of
> course, you'll find you like it less than you thought you would, and
> know to avoid it in future. (This happened to me with HQ2, and with some
> other system I tried recently, that unfortunately I can't recall the
> name of). This is part of the point of convention games, IMO.
>
>
> --
> Trotsky
> Gamer and Skeptic
>

Powered by hypermail