Re: Lion Gods

From: Adam Benedict Canning <dahak_at_...-online.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:17:56 +0100


> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:27:47 EDT
> From: TTrotsky_at_...
> Subject: Re: Lion Gods
>
> Adam Canning:
>
> << Well, I've done a horse, so I'll leave out the mule. But
> otherwise:
> >
> > Lion: Claw & Bite 2W^2 (+22 APs/companion), Mane & Thick Skin
> ^1, Ambush
> 18*,
> > Large 18, Panic Target 15, Strong 2W
>
> No Worship Basmol?>>
>
> IMO, the typical furry lion cannot gain divine intervention
> (which is
> pretty much, in game terms, what the Worship rating does). A
> sentient lion
> might well do so, of course. Anyway, why wouldn't it worship
> (say) Durbuddath?

> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:33:34 -0400
> From: "KYER, JEFFREY" <jeff.kyer_at_...>
> Subject: Re: Re: Lion Gods
> >
> > IMO, the typical furry lion cannot gain divine
> intervention (which is
> > pretty much, in game terms, what the Worship rating does). A
> sentient lion
> > might well do so, of course. Anyway, why wouldn't it worship
> (say) Durbuddath?
> >
> > Trotsky
> >
> >
>
> Oh no.
>
> Religious schisms amongst the big cats on the next Geraldo!
>
> I'd just go with a huschen who looks like the best match and have done
> with it -- for a sentient animal anyways. Telmor, sofal, etc seem to
> have extensive numbers of sentient or pretty darn clever critters.

Point being in RQ3 as I understood it all wolves [including Nonsentients] were Telmor Initiates. By extention all lions are Basmoli etc. Of course the University of Jurustela Theocolgy Department may have claimed both Basmola dn Durbuddath were one and the same.

Sorry about delay on replying, this digest sort of disappeared on my ISP's server.

Adam

Powered by hypermail