In message <200006191518.QAA10508_at_...>, Alex Ferguson
<abf_at_...> writes
>I'd think that losers would do this continually, given the option.
>It would indeed normally be a much slower way to lose a fight,
>if it's headed that way anyway. You might want to consider a
>similar rule as a defender option, at a less 'favourable' ration,
>maybe.
A suggestion from someone who hates Action Points, if you'll accept it:
Have the option for the defender be at a lower number of APs, five or
six to make it clear that letting yourself get wounded is a desperation
tactic.
--
Michael Cule