Bryan Thexton:
> Obviously, as the saying goes, you can't please all of
> the people all the time. The nebulous feats was
> obviously a design decision of the rules. It is
> totally fair for you not to like the ambiguity, and
> you are free to define the feats more tightly for your
> own use, but I totally fail to see how the fact that
> you don't like the ambiguity is a rules issue.
Feat descriptions aren't rules? The utility thereof isn't a rules issue?
> It takes enough time to read these lists as is,
> without a lot of non-constructive criticism clogging
> them up.
That's unfair. Numerous people have made assorted suggestions about 'useful variants'; if there's 'non-constructive criticism' that's 'clogging' anything, it seems to be largely from the "Your suggestion would ruin the game, which is Platonicly Perfect as it stands" crowd.
Cheers,
Alex.
Powered by hypermail