>
>If I recall correctly, this is not correct. There is an explanation of
>mastery levels and what they mean in real world terms
somewhere early in
>the rules. 1W is meant to represent a "professional" level of skill,
>>someone who can go about the task under normal
>circumstances and succeed >almost all of the time. 2W was
>presented as something like a "Old >Master" (able to achieve
>marvelous effects most of the time), and 3W+ is >superheroic.
>And since when is "professional" levels not above the human
>norm?
Since anybody with any decent amount of time in a job is going
have something at a 'professional' level. Unless of course they are
a civil servant.