>Tim Ellis:
>> >Why isn't it just one exchange? It seems obvious to me that the
>> >spearman's attempt to thwart the cavalry charge is a single exchange.
>>>
>>It is, Under the HW rules, though, it is a separate exchange from the
>>Cavalry charge striking the spear wielder.
>
>Under the HW rules it is definitely _not_ necessary for it to be two
>exchanges.
Not necessary, no. But it is the standard, by-the-numbers way of resolving combat. And you don't _need_ to make an exception for this particular case. However, if you _want_ to make an exception, that's cool too.
Powered by hypermail