Ah. That old theory. It originates from an British 19th c. cavalry officer cum archaeologist , whose name eludes me, who proposed this. He has since been quoted back and forth until everyone believes it. There is very little evidence for it to have been such a turning point in cavalry tactics as he thought. There were cavalry charging with lances who did not use stirrups. Early Germanic tribes, for instance, charging the aforementioned Roman formations. Some of the Hellenistic cavalry is another prime example.
Most cavalry, with the exception of medieval knights, skirmished, or had others skirmish, with the infantry and only charged if they wavered. This is especially true of all sorts of eastern horse tribes, the Huns, the Scythians, the Tatars, and so on and so forth. Charging infantry in good order has always been a pretty desperate move, if you do not know that they are prone to break, or if you are wearing heavy armour. And even in those cases arrows and javelins were generally used before. Why not use the main superiority you have over foot sloggers: the mobility?
I would think this is how Grazelanders, Pentans, Praxians, etc., do.
-- Henrix
Powered by hypermail