Guy
|From: Frank Rafaelsen [mailto:rafael_at_...]
|
|I think that the debate about ambigious feats should either be
|brought to
|an end, soon, or taken too private emails. I think it is
|outside the scope
|of this group: it is no longer a matter of HW rules, but
|rather a question
|of design philosophy. I don't mind design-philosophy debates,
|but when it
|is driving people away from a list dedicated to HW-rules, it should be
|limited.
|
|The sides in the debate seems to be well entrenched anyway, so I don't
|think any further debate is worth alienating potential newcomers to the
|list and the glorantha community.
|
|Just my humble opinion
|
|Ha en god dag!
|Frank Rafaelsen
|
|(Who has experienced that ambigious references are tough for beginning
|role-players, but immensly liberating for experienced
|role-players with no
|prior knowledge of Glorantha.)
|
|
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|-----<e|-
|Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Apply NOW!
|1. Fill in the brief application
|2. Enjoy a half minute of relaxation
|3. Get rates as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Ongoing APR and no
|annual fee!
|http://click.egroups.com/1/7876/11/_/385715/_/965992261/
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|-----|e>-
|
|To Post a message, send it to: hw-rules_at_...
|
|To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
|hw-rules-unsubscribe_at_...
|
Powered by hypermail