Re: Digest Number 256

From: Charles Corrigan <glorantha_at_...>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 22:11:45 -0000

> Arbitrarily choosing lower numbers, and then claiming the original
> is inflated seems a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy.

Exactly!

Perhaps if they were called "competencies" rather than "masteries" then many would accept them more (and at the same time complain of the boring, unimaginative terminology).

Having a 15 in HW does not map to 75% in RQ terms - it means that a HW character can succeed at _unopposed_ tasks 75% of the time. All rolls of any significance in HW should be opposed and then other variables come into play.

regards,
Charles

Powered by hypermail