>>Arbitrarily choosing lower numbers, and then claiming the original
>>is inflated seems a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy.
Mikael:
>What then do you call it when Greg arbitrarily chooses higher numbers
>and then claims the original is deflated (or words to that effect)?
Well, whichever the game mechanics bear out, was right. The current scale works. Reducing the numbers requires fudges like people with a skill of 12 or more not having to roll.
Philip Hibbs http://www.snark.freeserve.co.uk/ Opinions expressed may not even be my own, let alone those of any organisations, nations, species, or schools of thought to which I may be affiliated.
Powered by hypermail