Re: Digest Number 261

From: Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley_at_...>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 17:02:37 +0100


>Message: 23
> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 14:38:27 +0100
> From: philip.hibbs_at_...
>Subject: Re: Taking a shot at Eurmal...
>
>>Isn't sensuality too, uh, civilized
>>for the Eurmali. How about sedduction?
>
>Why mince words, why not call it "sex"? Seduction has implications that
>normal persuasive methods are used... not very trickster-like. "Impersonate
>lover" isn't a seduction power, but could fit under "sex", as could
>"enlarge member", "remove genitals", "self-gratify", and any number of
>amusing or horrifying abilities, many unpublishable.

Lust? In any case a cast iron argument against detailed feat descriptions!

Thom

Powered by hypermail