Jane wonders:
>> >Arbitrarily choosing lower numbers, and then claiming the original
>is
>> >inflated seems a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy.
>>
>> What then do you call it when Greg arbitrarily chooses higher
>numbers
>> and then claims the original is deflated (or words to that effect)?
>
>No good. I've read this, re-read it, thought about it, and still
>don't
>understand.
Sorry. Playtest versions of HW against Greg's published version of HW.
--
-
Mikael Raaterova [.sig omitted on legal advice]