Re: Digest Number 275

From: Thom Baguley <t.s.baguley_at_...>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:08:37 +0100


> From: "Wulf Corbett" <wulfc_at_...>
>See my parallel thread to this one: what if the enemy has a high anti-
>archery defensive edge? Without taking that into consideration, this
>is unfairly advantaging the archer's side. Take Saturday's game:
>Fanchon ended up with a ^16! Without a bid of 17+AP (excluding
>multiples), you couldn't affect her, so how come your AP loan is
>effective?

Distraction, knockback, duckback and so on. Even wearing inpenetrable bullet proof armour I'd be distracted by people hitting me. Gaining AP seems like a fair representation of this - you can't reduce the enemy below zero, but you can help your friends gain an opening.

Thom

Powered by hypermail