Re: Digest Number 577

From: Jeff <jeff.kyer_at_...>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:45:29 -0000

> At 04:02 PM 6/14/2001 -0000, you wrote:
> >I'm having trouble with sexy and Humakt in the same sentence. But
I
> >do think that, after the huge, stupid, loud furor over feats
earlier,
> >the writers are erring on the side of caution with the names of the
> >feats. To the point of being boring, IMO. Pity. I like the neat
> >names.
>
> Wow, we gonna get into Sunset Leap again?
>

Sorry folks. I'm grumpy today. As Nick's pointed out, I'm being a bit of a curmudeon about this.

Bad news RL leaks over into my normally sunny online personna. I normally am not quite so virulent in stating my opinions.

Again, appologies.

But I STILL say that there should _interesting_ names for feats. I like my funkyness.

And yes, I still like Sunset leap.

Jeff