Re: And one list to in the darkness bind them...

From: KYER, JEFFREY <jeff.kyer_at_...>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 09:27:48 -0400

Steve Lieb wrote:
>
> > We'll see how ti works out. HeroWars is sort of turning into a 'define
> > fiddly bits of Glorantha without resorting to esoterica' kind of list.
> > Hopefully, newcomers won't be inundated with minutae or references to
> > material they do not have access too.
> >
> > > This, to my mind, should be the purpose of the hw-rules list.
> >
> > I think Steve will probably step in here and mention what the purpose of
> > the two lists are.
> >
>
> Hrm, I can't really dodge that one, can I?
>
> Well, as I'd alluded to in an earlier post, the rules/world distinction for
> HW is far, far less than that of RQ/Glorantha ever was.
>
> The point of hw-rules was to talk specifically about the RULES. Originally.
> But if a conversation drifts hither and yon, I don't see it as my
> responsibility to force people to ONLY talk about rules. Certainly, if we
> get to the point where the same crapola is being hashed over repeatedly
> without resolution, I'll ask the participants to move it to the GD or more
> likely email.
>
> I won't interrupt "world" discussions to interject that there's some sort of
> nebulous requirement that something be "rulesy".
>
> I guess I hoping people will self-police.
> 1) if it's a rules application or interpretation question or comment, or a
> resource such as a hero band or something, hw-rules.
> 2) if it's a question that has to do about something within the context of
> the game - how someone lives, or whether anyone makes money, or whatever -
> these would be, IMO more suited for the GD or the HW group.
>
> -Steve

Sounds good enough for me. I'll be seeing about keeping things more or less on track on HeroWars.

Jeff

Powered by hypermail