Re: Re: followers; integration

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_...>
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 13:53:37 +1200


David Dunham:

>Me> [if you integrate an ancestor] You end up like Norman Bates IMO.

>I'm not so sure. We don't have an example (the Grazers don't
>integrate ancestors), but it's quite conceivable that you simply are
>"as brave as Drosox" or "as good with words as Elebel" if you've
>integrated that aspect of them.

But once you integrated them (and you can only integrate them once), they cease to have a separate existence and can't be contacted by anybody else. And it's more of "has Drosox's bravery" or "has Elebel's way with words" than the weaker forms you suggest. That's why I don't think that ancestors as a general rule are integrated.

I would instead prefer to channel ancestor (described in Heroforming) instead.

--Peter Metcalfe

Powered by hypermail