Re: Mystic in our midst

From: KYER, JEFFREY <jeff.kyer_at_...>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:48:02 -0500

Nils Weinander wrote:

> Jeff:
> >
> > Point taken but I was more concerned with what's close to hand. Though I am
> > gulty of such, having had a brief appearance of a very 'Kung-Fu' mystic in
> > our game for a few sessions, for those fans of the 70's show..
> >
> > He wanders in from nowhere. Sees some social injustices. Has a few
> > flashbacks to his temple upbringing. Admisters some Boot To The Head. He
> > wanders off to nowhere.
> >
> > And it gave us an opportunity to playtest the mystic rules under field
> > conditions.
>
> What's the verdict? I haven't field tested the mystic rules,
> but on ocular inspection they don't look promising.

Mixed. Mixed. The problem is that they are a bit weak with the disciplines before they get their powers. But they are very quick to reach their powers, as the three abilities they use (Body, Mind, Spirit) are *abilities* and not affinities or traditions or grimoires. Very, very, VERY quick to go up compared to the other magician types.

Lo Hung Mung reached his 10w2 in them in very short order but was rather helpless until he reached a high level in them. After that he was nigh-invulnerable... or at least close enough to be a wee bit on the spooky side. In the Otherworld he was in a bit of a bind but then he never went there, not believing in entangling himself so.

Jeff

Powered by hypermail