>Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_...> wrote:
> > The "He's not good, he's anti-bad!" could be said about Urox so I
> > don't think it's helpful to distinguish between the good done by chaos
> > and the good done by others.
>A more serious problem, I think, is that it's unclear that the Lunars are,
>ultimately, a force for good.
Why? Why must such a judgement be made about the Lunars and not say the Orlanthi or the Malkioni?
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail