Roderick and Ellen Robertson wrote:
>
> > Custom, Kinship and Law are covered to an amazing degree but remain
> > quite readable -- the writing is not dry! Its told from an insider
> > standpoint, rather than an anthropologist's dissertation.
>
> I'd like to say publicly that the "not dry" stuff is John Hughes'
> contribution (well, okay, some of the other stuff is his too) - I was blown
> away when we got his first files, and he just got better with re-writes.
> A big hand for the man!
Yeah! I thought it was his stuff but I didn't know how the workload had broken down. John's stuff rules, without being rulsey. This stuff is GOOD. I was up reading it till 3am last night.
> Me? well, I'm mostly the dry boring rules-y stuff.
> Roderick
>
And the useful keyword-y stuff, m'man! (though much of that is David D's stuff)
Jeff
Powered by hypermail