> > Although for an audience where Atman is an unknown
> term, Dharma is to be avoided.
> >
> > Or was... :)
> OTOH, I imagine that most readers here have at least
> read the term Atman, if only in Zelazny form.
I first knowingly encountered it here. Never heard of
"Dharma" before, but then if both are to be used for
exclusively Gloranthan concepts, that's a positive
point in their favour.
No point in re-using some normal everyday word and
giving it a new meaning, we'll only get confused.
Powered by hypermail