Re: Re: Sex and RPG

From: KYER, JEFFREY <jeff.kyer_at_...>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:29:38 -0500

Mikko Rintasaari wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Gareth Martin wrote:
>
> >
> She is both a woman and a warrior. Why should she stop being a woman,
> just because she's a warrior? Vinga's followers are female warriors
> that
> don't take on a man's role, but stay women. Tomboys they are, but
> still
> definitely women.

This explanation works for me. Heck, I'm annoyed that my male characters are covered in tatoos. I hate tatoos.  

> Leggings and a short dress is quite handy, I understand.

I asked Melanie about that and she said she usually wears leggings under her skirt because her legs get cold, especially when the skirt is short or the winter is cold. But she's a practial creature.  

> Personally I'm quite fond of the Vingans, and my players don't seem to
> regard them as any kind of second-rate warriors either.
>
> -Adept

True enough. Our best warrior is a Vingan. She's much more flexible and innovative than the Humakti.

Jeff

Powered by hypermail