Wulf Corbett wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:36:03 -0500, "KYER, JEFFREY" <jeff.kyer_at_...>
> wrote:
> >I don't see why not. As long as its one of your mundane augements -- of
> >which you are allowed one.
>
> >You cannot augment your Close Combat with your Close Combat (which is
> >what the various weapon styles amount to)
>
> Erm... don't those two statements contradict one another (so long as
> Shieldwall is within Close Combat)?
>
> >Fyrd Combat is probably a rather specific type of fighting rather than a
> >particular weapon based techinque. A bunch of guys together standing
> >shoulder to shoulder rather than the 'Warrior's Bttle or Champion's
> >battle.' Perhaps Shieldwall Fighting should be moved out as well.
>
> I would have thought both should be in or out together, certainly.
>
> >(Now, I'd rather not have the list taken over by an SCA esque diatribe
> >on what does/does not contitute that sort of fighting)
>
> Agreed. Any load of shields in a line can be fought as a Shieldwall.
>
> Wulf
Oh! Sorry. I figure they should both be out or both be in.
Its a tactic rathre than a technique. It depends on other people rather than yourself. And I'll stick with them being separate, non-close combat abilitites.
Jeff
Powered by hypermail