> BTW, what's the _reason_ for not initiating boys every year? Is there so
> little work to do that the heortlings can afford to have kids in their
> late teens remaining outside the workforce? Is it perhaps that they want
> as large groups as possible going through the male bonding that Bryan
> suggests?
>
I had assumed that it was due to the dangers of initiation - a larger group was more likely to be successful.
Cheers,
Graham
-- Graham Robinson The Stableyard - Internet Solutions gjr_at_... http://www.thestableyard.net
Powered by hypermail