> Fact 1. The original post did not say that calling a ship "Paris Commune"
> was funny.
The original post compared the "paris commune" with the "hss beaver" It didn't take great leap of logic to think there had to be some common ground, ie humour.
> Fact 2. There is nothing funny about the paris commune. Anyone who got the
> reference would know that.
Exactly. That's where my "i fail to see the pun or humour in paris commune" comment came from. Once again, compare with "beaver" where anyone who gets the reference see the humour.
> Fact 3. That Moah misunderstood the post, believing there was a joke, shows
> he didn't get the reference.
Unfortunately, you could have watched at my email, seen the ".fr" and conclude I got the reference. Instead you assumed the intellectual laziness was on my part and answered a question noone asked.
> Fact 4. Looking up the reference on Google answers his question.
No.
However, Stewart answered my question.
Moah, platypus powaaa!
Powered by hypermail