>I thought Nick's complaint was that Greg, having read and
>agree with stuff one day, turned round and ignored it the next when
>working on the same topic (see discussion of the nature of the Red
>Emperor passim)
The Red Emperor flamefest was never about Greg changing his ideas on the nature of the Red Emperor. It was about rebutting the silly interpretation that someone had given to Greg's words even to the extent of misreading the Fortunate Succession.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail