>From your tone, you clearly do not believe this discussion has value. Nor am I interested in being the object of your tone. So, I'll withdraw from that discussion.
In the event that you don't know what I'm talking about, I have excerpted some examples below.
> So what?
. . .
> a pointless waste of time.
. . .
> getting thoroughly tired of kneejerk
> whinging about it.
. . .
> Your methodology of just questioning everything
> is a) a pointless waste of time that only
> b) causes more heat than light if the skepticism is
> not reasonable.
. . .
> Sure looks like it with your constant refrain
> that this comes from the prosopeadia and
> so is untrustworthy.
. . .
> you are just padding out your argument
> with pointless questions.
. . .
> You can do it in the privacy of your own home then
> instead of inflicting needless screeds of textual
> analysis on everybody else.
. . .
> Who is we? Do you have multiple personalities?
. . .
> So you were just accusing me of hypothetically
> doing violence to any praxian stories? Let me
> see if I've got this right. If I were to say
> stuff like "You could go play in the traffic",
> it doesn't really mean anything because it's
> hypothetical? I'm glad that's been sorted out.
Chris Lemens
(Not an ad: If you have a little extra money to donate to a good cause, check out http://www.modestneeds.org/.)
Powered by hypermail