> Right. Rugby's a good sport. Football is different
> in that it is a sport of strategy, not tactics.
> It's like getting to line your troops up before
> sending them into battle, rather than just rushing
> out onto the field. To get weapons, you have to
> switch over to hockey (where "fight" is actually a
> valid play).
That wasn't what we were taught in school (though it's a pretty good description of what we actually did).
But the important question about this "football" - does it involve good-looking blokes in very short shorts? Or not? Heavy body armour sounds like it may conceal more than I'd prefer, at least that's the impession I've got from the little I've seen in films.
Powered by hypermail