Re: Re: In Defence Of A Goddess

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_rTqR0n3Ok1UTVaS6CpDZhRaU8kdKXu0P5ZswyR6OLmU2EmGoDVN50aQqr6699C_4Xst>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:13:49 +1200


At 01:16 a.m. 1/06/2007, you wrote:
>Peter Metcalfe:
> > > >Entekos.
> > >
> > >Of course. A child of Umath with no mother, according to Simon's
>web
> > >site. Or a child of a homosexual union between Umath and Aether.
> > >Interesting... do the various Unfinished myths bear this out?
> >
> > The Entekosiad implies that she is the goddess EthElsor, the
> > first ancestress, rising into the Sky. No male agency involved.
>
>That's boring, though. Born because of Umath and Aether rubbing up
>against one another and then separating them to keep Aether pure,
>that's far more fun.

Aether? Umath? Who are they? When Entekos rose into the Sky, there was nobody else around.

--Peter Metcalfe            

Powered by hypermail