The Man who would be an initiate.

From: Darren <d.staples_at_aQkP98L9r_sHvSaXN9iKxDNYJttHJAyJ6nMhPpGp-Dd08DMRkLGJq9dCnVQw1CuZwi>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:46:57 -0000

And just when I thought that this list had turned into the new Gloranthan Digest, I manage to offend my good friend and fellow GM, Mr. Phipp :o) Long live Immoderate GloranthaQuest!

Simon, you *know* I don't understand the rules, so smothering me in them will not make a slight bit of difference as I'll ignore them as I ignore them always.....

> We ... have ... no ... imagination ... we ... play ... RQ ...

And so do I. Ergo, I have no imagination.

> > As David Scott points out, it's odd that the rules lawyers never
> > seem to quote YGWV or MGF.
>
> What's the point? Whenever you run a scenario, your Glorantha/Game
> has varied.

Agreed. So whenever you run a game and your Glorantha varies, it invalidates anyone quoting rules at someone else as their Glorantha has varied too. So if Dar is King or not, who gives a double flying fuck. If it ever comes up in my Glorantha, then I'll worry about the semantics, but until then, life's too short.

> I've never understood MGF in the first place. Why would you be
> playing if it wasn't fun? If you don't like crunchy rules you
> wouldn't be playing RQ. If you didn't like fast flowing rules, you
> wouldn't be playing HQ. People play the games they enjoy and tend to
> have fun.

Again I agree. Shit I'm agreeing far too much for this list. You play to have fun, or at least that is the intention, but not all games are fun. Remember I got kicked out of a games group for trying to inject some fun. I guess their game varied.

> > Darren (sitting quietly and waiting for the pedant's revolt)
>
> Bloody architects.

I.T Boy! :o)

> I'm not strictly a pedant, but ....

What? You're revolting??????            

Powered by hypermail