Re: Anthropowanking

From: Simon Phipp <soltakss_at_DJF_dky6tqomEOxCxrFXR0Cpctkjwt3hwZdGxNm9tmJpuNeT8mXrDzeTSUezLawBo0w>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:09:54 -0000


Julian Lord:

> A debate has recently surfaced at IGQ, whether long nitpicky
> discussions of Gloranthan minutiae ad nauseam are appropriate or
not
> to this list.
>
> Now, everyone is entitled to their opinion, and is more than
welcome
> to defend that opinion, and even hire the odd mercenary flame
warrior
> to destroy any dissenting opinion(s) they may dislike.
>
> Nonetheless, anthropowanking is eminently unsuitable for mainstream
> Glorantha list discussion, and produce of such can therefore be
> splurged across computer screens worldwide via this forum.
>
> Of course, opposing members are similarly free to deride the
> anthropowankers (and in no uncertain terms if so desired), and with
> similar rights of freedom of speech, and perhaps without the
inherent
> limitations that such intellectual self-gratification can
potentially
> engender.

Jolly Good.

Now, what does that mean in English?

See Ya

Simon            

Powered by hypermail