Re: Re: Terror in war

From: oswaldtrimling_at_NzwFC3-TPSpiJQe6ONfN7R5km0qSIzGEcmCKObsPr3c-xt1fHSBaKFDI7YP3e <oswaldtrimling_at_NzwFC3-TPSpiJQe6ONfN7R5km0qSIzGEcmCKObsPr3c-xt1fHSBaKFDI7YP3eDVO>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:41:49 +0100


David Weihe wrote:
>
> > Richard Dawkins I believe lays into the organised
> > religions and asserts that all devout people are
> > dangerous because they are prone to acts because
> > 'God tells me to do it.'
>
> What church did Pol Pot go to?
>

It may be possible to be dangerous without being religious - in much the same way as its possible to be dangerous without being a red-hot poker. And the fact that some things can be dangerous without being red hot pokers, does not necessarily prove that most (or even many) red hot pokers are safe.            

Powered by hypermail