> It may be possible to be dangerous without being religious - in much
the
> same way as its possible to be dangerous without being a red-hot poker.
> And the fact that some things can be dangerous without being red hot
> pokers, does not necessarily prove that most (or even many) red hot
> pokers are safe.
And now let's add some rabid anti-religious bigotry to the stew...
Geez Mark, I'm afraid you were responding to only the tip of the
iceberg on this list.
Jeff