Re: Terror in war

From: oswaldtrimling <oswaldtrimling_at_Ou8AaPT4J2ALJvqWaMdq3DfbtSqMKJsbo1GQr1pZ4nADgcmpB05-j6hn_gNvw>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:42:11 -0000

• In ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com, "Simon Phipp" <soltakss_at_...> wrote:
  >
  > Me:
  > > > Why should there be a "Good" Orlanthi? Or a good anything else,
  > > > really?
  > >
  > oswaldtrimling:
  > > Because, as I've said before, without one, the game isn't fun for me.
  > > It may be great for other people, and I've no problem with that. But,
  > > for me, it would not be fun - and I game to have fun.
  >
  > Ah, I see. So you might as well ask "Where is the Dark Lord?".
  

Sorry; I have no idea what that means :(

> Very few wars are fought as "good vs evil", although most are
> justified in that way.

To be sure; and the Rebellion certainly isn't an exception. But that does not mean that there aren't good people on both sides (and evil ones too, and many in between). Or, at least, it doesn't mean that there *can't* be good people on the Heortling side, which is what I require to make the game entertaining.